Discussion about this post

User's avatar
TaNaisha J. Lee Garrett's avatar

Great share Ehden!

Any word on peer reviewed publication?

Hopefully, they can increase the "N" and publish in the same journal as the abstract.

I plan to reach out to Dr. Steven Gundry about this next week.

epi's avatar

The Pulse score increased from 11% ro 25% with a net change of 14%. This is the rate that tentatively can be assumed to apply to a healthy person. The articles abstract says "At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.". If the period of elevated risk for ACS within 5ys last 2.5 months then the risk for a healthy person to acquire ACS within these 2.5 months is 0.58% (14*2.5/60). That is a significant number compared to a covid IFR of 0.096% and perhaps a good explanation for these athletes are dropping like flies.

https://www.ukcolumn.org/community/forums/topic/big-list-of-athletes-after-jab/

7 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?