15 Comments
Jan 17, 2022·edited Jan 17, 2022Liked by Ehden Biber

The contract is in contempt of the law of contract and UCC, Therefore an unlawful and illigal one sided adhesion contract, without equal consideration, therefore not enforceable at law as it grants no indemnity or subrogation if injury occurs. - He who causes the liability is responsible for the remedy. How many know that though? A contract must be lawful before it can be legal and this contract from the inception is not lawful, bonding all parties to be personally liable for all damages and exemplary damages. 🤔The perpetrators of this contract should be jailed for fraud by false representation and the party agreeing to it should be removed from office for incompetence in their due diligence and is bonded to the liability as a Trustee for its ramifications thereafter. Jail also for all those involved for vicarious liability.

Expand full comment
Jan 17, 2022Liked by Ehden Biber

Yes...we are very much in danger and there are too many psychopaths in our governments that create this global situation...Legally and morally this agreement that was signed "secretly" is absolutely TREASON.

Expand full comment
Jan 17, 2022Liked by Ehden Biber

Emden, thank you for your courage! This is an important work and now I understand why governments from so many countries act the sama, say the same thing and behave the same way!

Expand full comment
Jan 17, 2022Liked by Ehden Biber

And bare in mind that the Treason Act is a constitutional law and can not be diminished by legislation to acquire impunity!

Expand full comment
Jan 17, 2022·edited Jan 17, 2022

I do not necessarily subscribe to the digital currency theory, but the wording of the contract is sufficient to prosecute officials that signed it for treason. This explains quite clearly why the Pfizer-Israel contract has major sections blackened and is under security secrecy blanket for 30(!!!) years. Thank you for your work

Expand full comment
Jan 17, 2022Liked by Ehden Biber

Fantastic work Eh'den 👏

Expand full comment

No contract can void laws of TORT and Criminal intent or Negligence. Nor is a contract valid when it is based on Lies and False representation of product. All we need is an HONEST COURT and JUDGE.

Expand full comment

Also www.globalresearch.ca search Corona Investigative Committee. Contracts with govs are from US DoD not manufacturers and classed a prototypes, not pharma products so no "rules" apply!

Expand full comment

Check out Bailiwick News.

Expand full comment

Dear Ehden, Thank you so much for writing this wonderful letter. It must have taken you a long time and much effort. We need hundreds of thousands more Great Patriots like You who have a genuine love for our country and its people. It is beset with those who want to drag it down and flog its treasures for a penny, for their own selfish, depraved and unnatural motives. We stand on the brink of its destruction and devastation. Those of us fighting for the Truth to "Out" have a serious and perilous war on our hands. Stay strong brother —we must stand and unite and never give up or give in! Godspeed and God Bless You!

Here's others: Katherine Watts (I got your substack from her link) and Sasha Latypova:

Biotech idolatry: DOD-Pfizer contracts have replaced federal constitutions and laws

https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/biotech-idolatry-dod-pfizer-contracts

The role of the US DoD (and their co-investors) in "covid countermeasures" enterprise.

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/the-role-of-the-us-dod-and-their

Expand full comment

Pages 48,49 - 4. The Participating Member State acknowledges that the Vaccine and materials related to the Vaccine, and their components and constituent materials are being rapidly developed due to the emergency circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic and will continue to be studied after provision of the Vaccine to the Participating Member States under the APA. The Participating Member State further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known. Further, to the extent applicable, the Participating Member State acknowledges that the Vaccine SHALL NOT BE SERIALIZED. [EMPHASIS ADDED]

Expand full comment

Pages 14,15 - 1.6.5 Legal and regulatory filings and requests

The Contractor shall ensure that all Product is properly labelled and packaged in accordance with the provisions of Article 1.6.8 and Good Manufacturing Practice and in accordance with the applicable EU legislation on information on packaging (Title V of Directive 2001/83/EC).

Notwithstanding the above, prior to delivery, the Contractor shall comply with all conditions (in the relevant timescales) set out in the Authorisation (where applicable), subject to any exemption, exception or waiver of requirements for the Product granted or permitted by the Participating Member State (including but not limited to SERIALIZATION). [EMPHASIS ADDED]

Expand full comment