A new abstract by Steven R Gundry, from the the International Heart and Lung Institute, Palm Springs, CA, has been published in Circulation Journal (November 16, 2021 Vol 144, Issue Suppl_1). The Protein Unstable Lesion Signature Test, also known as PULS test, measures the traces of proteins that leak from cardiac lesions in the blood vessel walls. By identifying the presence and levels of these proteins, along with HDL and HbA1c, it provides physicians with valuable information to help determine one’s risk for a heart attack and what steps one need to take to improve your cardiac health.
The Pulse score increased from 11% ro 25% with a net change of 14%. This is the rate that tentatively can be assumed to apply to a healthy person. The articles abstract says "At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.". If the period of elevated risk for ACS within 5ys last 2.5 months then the risk for a healthy person to acquire ACS within these 2.5 months is 0.58% (14*2.5/60). That is a significant number compared to a covid IFR of 0.096% and perhaps a good explanation for these athletes are dropping like flies.
So these are people who already have heart issues, and the vax made their existing issues worse? I'm not sure how this relates to normal people, though clearly it's a strong signal to avoid these things if you already have heart issues.
Vaccination temporary increases inflammation, that's how vaccines work. The question is if the markers are far out of the expected range, or if they stay elevated for months after the vaccination.
Great share Ehden!
Any word on peer reviewed publication?
Hopefully, they can increase the "N" and publish in the same journal as the abstract.
I plan to reach out to Dr. Steven Gundry about this next week.
The Pulse score increased from 11% ro 25% with a net change of 14%. This is the rate that tentatively can be assumed to apply to a healthy person. The articles abstract says "At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.". If the period of elevated risk for ACS within 5ys last 2.5 months then the risk for a healthy person to acquire ACS within these 2.5 months is 0.58% (14*2.5/60). That is a significant number compared to a covid IFR of 0.096% and perhaps a good explanation for these athletes are dropping like flies.
https://www.ukcolumn.org/community/forums/topic/big-list-of-athletes-after-jab/
So these are people who already have heart issues, and the vax made their existing issues worse? I'm not sure how this relates to normal people, though clearly it's a strong signal to avoid these things if you already have heart issues.
Vaccination temporary increases inflammation, that's how vaccines work. The question is if the markers are far out of the expected range, or if they stay elevated for months after the vaccination.