#PFIZERLEAK - CRIMES AGAINST #EU-MANITY - THE PREQUEL EDITION!
WHAT DID THE MEMBER STATES COMMIT TO WHEN THEY DIDN'T OPT-OUT OF THE EC AGREEMENT WITH VACCINE MANUFACTURERS AND WHY? The prequel to how the #EC tricked member states, MEPs and EU citizens.
(This thread has originally been posted on my Twitter account, starting the 17th of September 2021).
To understand what member states got dragged into these horrible agreements, let's go back to the agreement between the commission & member states on producing vaccines, annexed to EC decision C(2020) 4192 from the 18th of June 2020.
In a typical European Commission style, the APAs were "approved for signature on behalf and in the name of the participating Member States by a separate individual Commission decision."
Or in other words - the member states are rubber stamps to the EC decisions.
Or put it more bluntly:
"the Commission can sign on behalf of the Member States intermediary documents enabling the start, continuation and completion of the negotiations."
Or to put it even more bluntly:
"As regards the approval of APAs or intermediary documents that set terms and conditions of the APAs or otherwise contain legally binding obligations, THE COMISSION WILL EXCERISE ITSELF THE POWER IT HAS DELEGATED".
If you recall, the commission gave only 5 (!!) days for member states to opt-out of the agreement, if not they were obliged by the APA terms.
Member states are required to acquire the product directly from the manufacturers. It required the member states to sign a contract with the manufacturers.
However, the EC's APA agreement and all the clauses legally bind the member states who did not opt out.
"ONCE CONCLUDED, THE TERMS OF THE APA SHALL BE LEGALLY BINDING ON THE PARTICIPATING MEMBER STATES, EXCEPT FOR THOSE WHO HAVE EXERCISED THEIR RIGHT TO OPT OUT."
"Member States…shall bear any liability…this shall extend to and INCLUDE ANY INDEMNIFICATION OF VACCINE MANUFACTURERS under the terms and conditions of the relevant APA for liability related to the use and deployment of vaccines NORMALLY BORNE BY SUCH MANUFACTURER".
I will rephrase what you just read - the member states had to agree to identify the manufacturers with regards to the liabilities of vaccines WHICH THEY NORAMLLY WOULD HAVE CARRY.
Notice the use of past tense. This APA agreement has enforced a new legal "normal".
Let us dig deeper.
"A permanent solution to the COVID-l9 crisis is most likely to be brought about by the development and deployment of a SAFE and EFFECTIVE vaccine against the virus"
Safety & effectiveness? HA! Please see my #COptiGate thread:
Unroll available on Thread Reader
The EC set up a "steering board" co-chaired by EC and ONE member state, and included "senior officials from all Participating Member States".
Notice the term "officials". Which officials?
Based on my previous thread, MEPs where not part of the loop.
The negotiating team was made of a limited number of experts from the 6 participating member states with production capacities for vaccines who made "its best effort to take the advice of the steering board into account".
Everyone who were part of the negotiation were required to sign strict confidentiality and no-conflict-of-interest agreements, which also meant that no one who were part of the negotiation were allowed to share any concerns with member states and MEPs.
"Before making any final decisions, the Commission will seek independent scientific advice on the state of progress and the available data on quality, safety and efficacy for the vaccine candidate in question."
WHO WERE THE EXPERTS?
How independent were they?
The up-front payments under the APA funded development, clinical trials, and preparation for up-scale production capacity.
Does it mean that EU member states were funding Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, etc.? Is that why Pfizer & Moderna made so much profit?
Moderna received $360m from the EU, Pfizer got $700m. Both companies stashed the vaccine profits in tax havens.
Moderna accused of parking vaccine profits in tax havens: report
Pfizer uses Netherlands to shield billions in profits from tax:
Pfizer sluist miljardenwinst weg via Nederland (original Dutch article)
"The purchase price…as well as the amount of funding provided up front will take into account a transparent estimation of production costs"
Again - how come Pfizer and Moderna increased their prices while having such huge profits?
EC NEGOTIAION TEAM TOTAL FAILURE.
"For liability arrangements, the joint negotiation team will make its best effort to limit what is required by individual companies for the purpose of indemnification to be included in the terms and conditions of the APA"
NEGOTIAION TEAM BEST EFFORTS = NO EFFORTS.
Finally, the "we are the world" clause, or "Covid-l9 vaccine as a global public good." which was supposed to provide access for low and middle income countries to these vaccines & IP sharing, especially when it developed with public support".
It is PAINFUL to go over these documents, because the more I read, the more I understand how the EU is being run by undemocratic & non-transparent institutes, who don't give a darn about the safety of EU citizens and the financial burden they inflicted upon them.
EU member states were lured into this APA after being promised that this will be the most effective way to provide safe treatment for EU citizens.
The results speaks for themselves, and the total indemnification of all manufacturers is the most disturbing result.
This does not look like failed negotiation but a deliberate, well planned move to create a new regulatory landscape and financial reality that will lead to vaccine passports, digital currency, and total power of the EC over EU states and citizens.
Our democracies are in danger.