THE FIRST RULE OF THE PRIZER VACCINE CLUB

When you sign a deal with the devil, there are some house rules. This post is about the first rule you must follow...

Pfizer did everything they can to ensure the details of the contract remain hidden from us, the citizens who are being injected with, also known as "Third Party" to the two sides of the contract: our governments and Pfizer.
This is about how and why it is secret.

According to the contract's clause 1.11 “Confidential Information” Includes “all confidential or proprietary information, other than Exempt Information”.

The 1.20 “Exempt Information” definition includes information that “was already generally available and in the public domain at the time of disclosure, or becomes public (other than as a result of breach of this Agreement by the Recipient or its Representatives).”

1) We have the Brazil-Pfizer contract.
2) We have a statement by a Pfizer official that all contracts include the same legal obligations.

Could we claim in court that this should allow our government to show us the information as it is in the public domain?

No, we can't. What I didn't share with you when I showed you the "confidential information" clause was that according to the full clause "Confidential Information includes, WITHOUT LIMITATION, the terms and conditions of this Agreement."

How confidential is this contract? Let us look at article 10.1, "Non-Use and Non-Disclosure".

"Notwithstanding the foregoing, in all cases, (a) Purchaser MAY NOT DISCLOSE any of the financial or INDEMNIFICATION provisions contained in this Agreement".

And while the word "may" might seem to suggest discretion, it is the context of the word in the sentence that matters, as well as it matches the definition of confidential information which a party is not allowed to disclose, as appears in article 1.11.

A government exposure of the contract without Pfizer approval constitutes a violation of the contract, which can lead to a SECRET arbitration process at the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”).

YES, SECRET!

How can our governments commit they will not "make, or permit any person to make, any public announcement concerning the existence, subject matter or terms of this Agreement, the wider transactions contemplated by it, or the relationship between the Parties"?

How can our government commit that "ANY press release regarding this Agreement is subject to Pfizer’s review and prior written approval."?

What happened to the sovereignty of nations?

Our governments agreed that NO ONE is allowed to know anything about the exact scale of the indemnification and the financial commitments THEY made…even though it allows the government (and Pfizer) to escape criticism on this contract.

IS THAT NORMAL?

IS IT NORMAL that our governments (which are supposed to serve us) will make a commitment on OUR behalf , and hide that commitment from us because WE might get very upset if we find out their decision caused us harm and that we cannot sue Pfizer for damages?

While it is totally understood why Pfizer wants to keep the terms of the financial details hidden to allow it to maximize its profit, the extra effort to make sure NO ONE is allowed to talk about the indemnification clauses makes you wonder: what do they know?

Governments have hidden from us the nature of the commitment they made to Pfizer. They have used their power and their influence to create a state of fear, and promised us to take care of us if we give away our freedoms.

When more than 110 governments suddenly decide that they hide the indemnity commitment they made to a foreign entity via a contractual agreement, it is when I wonder if the sovereignty of the nation state still exists or is it part of the UN's #Agenda2030 plan?


According to Pfizer, on the 13th of May 2021 there were 110 countries around the world that signed a contract which had the same obligations Brazil made (which are the source of the snapshots I'm including).

Read the #PfizerLeak contract for yourself.

The Pfizer-Brazil contract, as was found on the internet

Lets recap what governments in at least 110 countries were doing:

1) Grab power by taking away our freedoms (e.g. lockdowns).
2) Crash attempts to develop or use an early treatment protocol.
3) Tells us that Gene therapy is "the way out" (via the media).
4) Sign contracts with Pfizer to buy the gene therapy treatment and give them full indemnity.
5) Rush gene therapy approval.
6) Seduce citizens to think compliance to treatment is the way to freedom.
7) Use the gene therapy as an instrument of population control.

What's next? Will our governments sign up contracts with foreign entities to take control over our country and give them indemnification for their operation?

Would they do so for pandemics? for global warming? To control the unvaccinated population?


If our governments can get away with signing confidential contracts with a foreign entity that states it is not required to obey the legislator and the judiciary, what will stop "our" governments from taking that path and expanding it to other "services"?


Pfizer gets HUGE profits and "get out of jail" card; our governments scares us to death then play our saviors. Anyone who objects the narrative is crushed, a state-censored science is promoted and used to take away our freedoms.

A Win-Win situation for both.

The collateral damage of this contract? We. Citizens of countries from all around the world are the "Third Party" whom Pfizer owns nothing, "Third Party" that our government is hiding from the scale of their contractual commitment.

Is that how democracy works?

It is time to expose these contracts in court, to show our fellow citizens that our governments are more concerned to protect Pfizer than protecting our health, and that they colluded with a foreign entity to suppress the pillars of our democracies.

WE HAVE SINNED. We allowed the suspension of our democracies out of fear, and opened up the path for our governments to sign illegal contracts that endanger our democracies.

It is time to surrender to the truth.
It is time to fight back.

THE PFIZER MANDATE - CALL FOR ACTION

BONUS!!!

Arbitration rules #1:
● laws are as defined by the contract (NY laws).
● Pfizer can demand process to be secretive.
● Countries must obey the decision.
● Court can rule on the subject whether or not a country will decide to appear in front of it …

BONUS!!!
Arbitration rules #2:
● If a country do not defend it is deemed to have waived its right to object.
● The court itself is ruled by a French law.
● Counties could have negotiated the arbitration location.
● The law that govern the contracts is NY law.

BONUS!!!
Arbitration rules #3:
When establishing the Facts of the Case, the court decides:
● If to hear witnesses or not.
● If to have expert opinion or not.
● If to rule solely on the court submission if any side did not ask for hearing.

BONUS!!!
Arbitration rules #4:
Pfizer and government nominate one arbitrator each, these two suppose to select the third arbitrator who act as chair of the tribunal, or the ICC if they cannot agree on time.

● The chair of the tribunal makes the award decision.

• • •

#PfizerLeak

Ehden