2 Comments

An excellent essay. posted this opinion of another substack.

SARS or Covid.

The idea is based on superstition and belief in the pseudo-science of virology and not in the science of biology. The unpalatable fact that irritates the believers in SARS or Covid is the problematic issue of the definition and the protocols that surround the issue of isolation to prove existence and aetiology. They have relied on a tool to support their assertion that is not fit for purpose.

The dogma requires that you believe in socialism and be politically correct and conform to group- think or consensus. If you do not then you are anti-science in their arrogant progressive opinion.

Your essay explains it so well that the EU commission was blatantly and willingly compromised to throw away the moral responsibility in order to support the crime in favour of their funding partners. It was wilful criminal collusion. It stinks of fascism.

Time to dismantle the EU IMO.

Expand full comment

I'm no legal expert. But the strangest thing to me about all this, is that they were signing vax contracts back in June 2020, when the virus supposedly had only been sequenced for a few months - not by any stretch of the imagination enough time to do anything but the most preliminary testing. All this in the context of the fact that nobody had ever previously developed a marketable vax for a coronavirus - when they tried to develop one for the original SARS the animal trials all showed (several papers, with different animals) that after vaccination, challenge with the infective virus killed 100% of the animals.

Yet right from the beginning they were all talking about "the Vax" - that had not even been developed yet - as the way out of the pandemic.

Expand full comment