27 Comments

Now that forfeiture clause is very interesting. Having produced a product that is manifestly bad is likely to be throw by out by nations desperate to save themselves and their people allows the backers of this initiative (the bankers) to seize assets they would otherwise have no recourse to. Asset seizure as a core driving force.

Expand full comment
Feb 5, 2023Liked by Ehden Biber

Wow! Boy they sure knew what they were doing. Are there any countries that did NOT sign on with Pfizer??? Thank you for this info. Very informative but I bet Thailand is PISSED. Hopefully they will share this themselves GLOBALLY.

Expand full comment

India, I think.

Expand full comment

Russia, China and Iran never allowed any of it into their countries. Remember, it was released in Iran and China. Wuhan most likely was chosen because the lab there was series passing Ralph Baric's U of North Carolina chimeric SARS vaccine. It would be easy to pin it on Wuhan and most would fall for it. Most people just want the feeling of moral superiority that comes from judging. Thinking takes too much work.

Does anybody believe Pfizer had the pull and financial resources to coerce these contracts on anyone? This was US military via US government all the way. Ukraine and BRICS+ is the result. America is looking for an excuse to go nuclear because they can't face the consequences of their own actions. This stuff has been building up for over a hundred years.

Expand full comment

Simply declare Pfizer a terrorist organization, vials a bioweapon and seize the product. Go after them on bioterrorism charges. No need for arbitration, all that cute stuff, really.

Expand full comment

They don't need to annul contract, go after Pfizer execs criminally, for murder, seize and test the vials and find them bullshit poison, stop paying, and let Pfizer try enforce the contract.

Expand full comment

"The important point is: Thailand cannot risk nullifying the contract because they put as collateral against this contract ALL OF THE COUNTRY ASSETS, including currency reserves and embassies!"

How about the concept of FRAUD nullifying all contracts?

Thank you, Ehden!

Expand full comment

Fraud is irrelevant. This is on a higher level. War is the only way.

Expand full comment

I'm wondering if Thailand could just be in breech and say "come and try to take our assets" It would be a PR nightmare for Pfizer if Thai King just said who is going to enforce this, come into our territory and counter sue us. I could see them hell bent because of the Princess collapse and just not comply and make this a complete international PR story and not care about the deals of the contract.

Expand full comment

They'll send in the CIA and special forces to poison the water and spread super deadly and contagious viruses everywhere, plus god knows what else. They've already been doing this but on a lower level. Look at what they were doing at the Kharkov lab. It curls the hair.

Expand full comment

Exactly my thoughts.

Expand full comment

I think it deleted my post because I put my email in there so what I was saying was it’s hard to tell because he is always speaking with Charlie ward and he seems so amazing and then he was on my doctor Summit and was very angry about what’s going on, yet a bunch of people are saying that he is a shill. But they also say that about Jordan Peterson. So I don’t know, and they also call Christine Anderson and nazi just because she’s German. Mind you those are liberals that say that about her so who knows.Sifrino at proton mail dot com. Is mine. Message me and I’ll let you know. Hehehe.

Expand full comment

If the contract is fraudulent -- which it certainly is, as the vaxxines are not vaccines, then "fraud-in-the-inducement" is the proper type of fraud it is-- a party induced into signing an agreement because of false promises. In fact, it's 100% that Pfizer must have anticipated being caught, to make the stakes so high... Pfizer and who else wants to assume the "king & Queen"-ship of Thailand under the guise of fraud and fraud.

Expand full comment

Kings are not limited to strictly legal paths. If the main parties to the jab at Pfizer, CDC and FDA were assassinated, proving that it was the King could be as hard as proving intentionality and knowingly on the part of Pfizer. It would also possibly cost less and be faster than legal action.

Expand full comment

Thailand must respect the contract in full.

There is nothing, I suppose, they can legally do about that.

But, as you write, they can go down the Israeli revenge path and assassinate the major parties involved (with their families) should make a clear example of why these things are not without consequences.

In fact, nothing prevent Thailand from leaving Pfizer alone as a business entity and going after Bourla, Walker and so on.

Expand full comment

You know, when I see him, and when I see how he talks, and how angry he gets, I say no, but for some reason people keep saying he is a shill. I’m not sure why. I mean I know for a fact that Pierre is a piece of shit but time will tell I guess. I’m hoping to go to the summit with all the speakers in Miami in May, and I will see Flynn and Charlie hopefully, and then I will know for sure. if I can remember, I will try to message you on here or you can always email me. sifrino@protonmail.com.

Expand full comment

Ehden, are you aware of the US dept of defense role in all this? Please view https://rumble.com/v288sjf-covid-19-countermeasures-evidence-for-an-intent-to-harm-full.html

Expand full comment

Anymore word on Thailand being able to nullify? Heard talk lastnight by Flynn that they still plan to withdraw. Sure hope so

Expand full comment

Flynn? Michael Flynn? If so, he's part of this.

Expand full comment

If it could be proved the product delivered failed specification Pfizer would be in breech? Percent mRNA integrity is one obvious candidate but, in my view, mRNA fidelity is the key. Pfizer’s product contains 4,284 bases all of which have to be aligned in correct sequence order. As far as I can tell no next generation sequencing has been done on any batches/lots of product by either Pfizer, their manufacturers or individual Government regulators. In truth no one knows if every one of those 4,284 bases comprising the active drug substance are correctly sequenced. There is more detail on this topic in an ongoing FOIA I have with the UK regulator, MHRA that you may find interesting

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/test_data_and_results_for_each_b#incoming-2216010

Expand full comment

All "info" quoted, such as 4,284 bases or any other claims -- are self-serving hearsay of hearsay of hearsay to Pfizer's sole benefit -- IF Someone says they perform certain actions in a laboratory (only "transparent" duplication of such actions more than once may be proof of supposed actions), that such actions "work as intended" (again, transparent duplication of the demo that such "works" may be proof), and one also has to define what is meant by "intended" --- cure, depopulation, increase/decrease morbidity --- all can be intentions -- and gotta be spelled out explicitly and, using the scientific method, demonstrated as true..... with malice demo'd not true.

Expand full comment

No.

EUA and similar Authorization don't require quality controls (because they were supposed to be applied only to small batches, not billions of doses).

Expand full comment

So it effectively comes down to the citizens of the US to wake up in enough numbers, and change the situation, for example a whistleblower comes forward with watertight evidence of fraud, that media would report, and that would probably require enough (new) legislators (probably a majority) to be honest enough to lend their support or lean on everyone else in the process. Public opinion is key. People are the only power, and I’ve always thought this will be fought and decided in the US.

Expand full comment